In the red

March 22, 2007 at 7:54 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I haven’t spoken to my brother yet, but it’ll probably work out like this: he pays for my dad’s care, and I owe him half once I finish residency.

Honestly, I’m in so much debt already that it doesn’t even matter.

Tulane: $40,000/yr; the University of Google: free

March 22, 2007 at 2:16 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Call me a dork, but I decided to google “why people get angry.” Google came up with this as the top link. Not sure what to think about that.

Respondipenia

March 21, 2007 at 3:32 pm | Posted in clerkships | Leave a comment

As in, shortage of answers.

I’ve been thinking today about how one arrives at an interesting question. The subject is particularly pertinent, because I have to come up with a topic for a presentation a month or so from now. And I seem to be having a lot of difficulty relating anything that I’m interested in medically to primary care.

So I guess really what I want is a question with an interesting answer. And maybe that’s a little easier to find. Interesting answers are found where things don’t make sense. Where you expected one thing to happen, but something else did instead.

For example, I bet there’s an interesting piece of basic science underlying the fact that I actually feel better with a hangover than I do on a normal morning. Having alcohol in my system is unpleasant, and so I don’t drink much, but when I do, I wake up the next morning and it’s like I spent a day at the spa. I’ve never been able to figure it out.

And it’s always interesting to me when someone who’s notoriously unstable reacts calmly to something that ought to provoke them. Clearly they have a card up their sleeve. Or when someone who’s famously unflappable gets angry at something you say that’s fairly innocuous in comparison to your usual range of interaction with them. This happened to me recently. I was completely blindsided by the angry response, and frankly I feel betrayed by it. I must have hit a nerve somehow, in a totally unexpected location.

Anyway, I’m really stumped about a topic for this presentation. I know it doesn’t have to be anything earth-shattering, but I’d like it to be interesting. Or at the very least, not a rehash of something someone else has done.

SAT analogy…money : resident :: _____ : turnip.

March 20, 2007 at 11:17 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Right now I’m waiting for my landlord’s repairman to arrive with my new washing machine. He was supposed to be here at 1pm, and in about 5 minutes I’m going to call and ask where he is. In the meantime I’ll write a bit.

Last night my brother called, congratulating me on my residency match. Then he asked me to call him regarding the $6000 he’s spent since January paying for my dad’s assisted living home. It sounded like, “great, you have a job, now you can help me pay these bills.” But I’m not sure he understands what I’m getting paid next year. He’s making easily three times what I’ll be making as a resident. And my rent will cost me as much as his mortgage is costing him. He has two cars, a boat, no remaining student loan debt and a boatload of money in savings. Meanwhile I could buy a very nice house with the amount of money I owe in student loans, and my residency stipend is just enough to survive on, and not enough to pay any of my debt back. And I bet he’s going to ask me to help pay dad’s expenses. {eye roll} gotta love the bro.

Woohoo, that was the repairman on the phone. They’re just down the street and will be here momentarily. More later.

No hands

March 19, 2007 at 10:27 pm | Posted in clerkships | Leave a comment

I’ve been doing my current rotation sans pocket references. I have decent supervision, so if I miss anything, it gets caught. And it makes things a little more challenging, and therefore interesting, to remember all the various treatment goals for the common conditions, and to diagnose the occasional unusual disease. One of these days I’m going to start bringing in my ophthalmoscope and start looking at people’s fundi, because I still suck at that, and it’s still important not to suck at that.

I’ll probably begin carrying reference books again when I start internship–I’ll have more responsibility with less supervision, and I don’t want to make a mistake. But for now I need the challenge.

Invitatus Es

March 14, 2007 at 6:21 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In the mail today, I received an invitation to this spring’s Friar Weekend at UT. The timing of the weekend is uncharacteristically good this year–right before our spring break. It’s also a little unusual that I actually got an invitation. After I moved to New Orleans, I would get them only haphazardly, and there’d been none since Katrina. I don’t actually need one, since as a Friar I have a standing invite to all their functions. But there are certain Friars who will never actually be invited to function, and I was beginning to wonder if I had become one of them.

Anyway, I may go. The spring Weekend is when they announce the winner of the Centennial Teaching Fellowship, which is worth a cool $10,000 for the winner. I’ve been on the selection committee a few times, and it always cracks me up how the bigwigs at UT nominate all these professors with impressive CVs, and completely neglect to consider their actual teaching skills. So we sift through literally hundreds of CVs, each one at least a score of pages long, if not two or three. But in the end the award always goes to someone who’s an outstanding teacher, and the judgment is based on our own observation of them teaching. Often the person also has an impressive amount of university service and a number of publications as well, but that’s only because of the value placed on it by most of the people making nominations.

It’s easy to teach well when you’re teaching to straight-A students. They make even the awful professors look competent at teaching. But I think the mark of a truly good teacher is when their C students are also performing like A students; understanding the difficult concepts, getting the tough questions right on the exam, being able to explain a concept to their friends or apply it correctly in a different context.

In fact, it was one of the award finalists who explained to me how the P450 enzymes work, and it was that explanation that enabled me to make the connection that got me interested in my research project. It’s over ten years later, and still every time I think about the topic, it’s that explanation that makes it understandable.

So I like to hear who wins each year, because even now it’s often someone I know. Also I like to hear what all the people I knew then are up to now. The Friars are basically the has-beens of campus politics, and most of them had political aspirations of some sort or another. But I hate going to those things alone. However, it’s slightly less desperate to go alone than to bring a random date, so alone it is…

Instrument-rated

March 13, 2007 at 9:42 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

So of the two programs listed, I knew already that one of them was not real. So I called the other one this morning and was told that the other program had also matched all their spots. Since I called at 11:04, I seriously doubt that they filled via the scramble.

It was hard to watch all those spots get filled in the other specialties while my own future remains so uncertain. I do hate uncertainty with a passion. And the cumulative events of these last two years have taxed all the reserves I have for dealing with it. So I spent much of the morning trying to picture myself as a resident in anesthesia, neurology, psychiatry, radiology, pediatrics, even medicine. But there truly is not anything else I can see myself doing for more than a year or two. Well, let me qualify that–nothing I can see myself enjoying. Certainly there are things I can do, and do well. And there’s always some enjoyment in simply being good at what you’re doing. But it’s not enough to sustain a career, without some intrinsic enjoyment of the field itself. Perhaps I’ll change my mind over this next year, but somehow I doubt it.

I’m a planner. I have plans on every time horizon imaginable. One year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, even thirty years ahead. The plans are always flexible–I know better than to expect things to go perfectly. In fact, changes in the plan don’t bother me at all. It’s being unable to plan in the first place that drives me crazy. And I tend to drive other people crazy when it gets like that in my life.

So right now I just have to trust that I’m on the right course. I can’t actually see the way ahead, which is certainly distressing, but I’ve made a plan that should get me to my goal.

And so this morning, with some effort, I closed the scramble list and went on with my day.

The games women play

March 13, 2007 at 9:20 am | Posted in professional ethics | Leave a comment

There was some minor drama in the week leading up to the rank list deadline. Someone sent me an anonymous message, naming one of my LOR writers as the reason I had not matched in neurosurgery. She (I’m certain the person is female) insinuated that the professor in question had torpedoed me in the letter, and was taken aback by the fact that I knew better. Even though I had waived access, the professor’s secretary had forwarded me a copy. So then she tried to tell me that he had reported me for unprofessional behavior. However, the school’s procedure for dealing with such a complaint requires that I be notified and given the opportunity to explain. And I never heard about it. Although I do know he was royally pissed off at me. I remember thinking to myself that it must have been my calling him “Dr.” that made him so angry, because I normally don’t begin my emails to him with a salutation of any kind. He’s the same age as me, and the relationship was informal enough that it felt weird to use his title, but he’d never asked me to call him by his first name. So I was always in a quandary as to how to address him, and when I called him “Dr.” in an email, he very correctly understood that it was an expression of anger. But his response was far in excess of what I expected. He stopped talking to me altogether. It seemed very out of character, out of proportion, and made no sense to me whatsoever. I had no idea why he was so angry or how to repair the damage. Or even where to start.

So I told this anonymous person that she had no idea what she was talking about. Then she tried to tell me that even though he may have written a good letter the first time, that I should not ask him to write another. Which was funny, because he’d already written me another, to use for a prelim position, and it was actually better than the first. I found that out entirely by accident, because all I asked for was a signed copy of the first letter to turn in to ERAS. However, when I went to pick it up, I thought I’d cheer myself up by rereading it, only to discover that it was completely different. I felt bad, but I had no way of knowing that it wasn’t the same letter.

Did I Match?

March 12, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Yes, I did. I matched a prelim year in general surgery, which is all that I applied for through ERAS. I listed an advanced position as well, just so that I would have access to the scramble list. But I’m on the fence as to whether I should go in tomorrow and try to scramble for something. There are supposedly 2 unfilled neurosurgery spots, but I seriously doubt those are real. They’re probably just an oversight–some program that matched through SF Match and forgot to cancel their eligibility through NRMP.

In any event, there’s not a lot of suspense regarding where I matched. I only ranked three programs, so it’s either MGH, UCSF or University of Washington (listed alphabetically, not necessarily in rank order). And the program I ranked #1 told me they were ranking me #1, so I’ll be surprised if I matched elsewhere. I ranked it #1 because the program director promised to give me 2 early neurosurgery rotations and to treat me the same as their categorical residents, and to actively support my search for a neurosurgery residency if I worked hard and was a good intern. And my gut told me I could trust the PD’s word.

Even so, it was awful trying to decide how to rank them. No matter what order I put them in, I had this completely irrational feeling that I was making a horrible mistake. But I could only choose from among the options before me, so there was no way around it. I certified my list at 7:59pm central time–one minute before the deadline. So I literally could not have waited one minute longer.

Objectively speaking, I really couldn’t have gone wrong no matter what order I ranked them. However, having a supportive PD is worth its weight in gold, and in the end that was the deciding factor.

Medical Marriages

March 7, 2007 at 3:39 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I ran across an interesting presentation on the subject of physician marriages. It lasts about 50 minutes, but the guy is a good speaker so it doesn’t seem that long.

Handicap, as in golf

March 5, 2007 at 2:30 am | Posted in clerkships, medical licensing exams | Leave a comment

Well, OB/GYN is over for now. I have to make up some time, even though I got more stuff signed off on my patient/procedure card than the majority of the class. And the shelf exam went better than I expected. But since we’re only paying lip-service to the idea that our rotations are competency based, none of that matters.

I finished the shelf with a great deal of time to spare, and felt about the same as I did after finishing medicine. I changed two answers, and both were from incorrect to correct. There were a couple of answers I checked on that were wrong, but by and large I was extraordinarily lucky in that the exam was mostly over the small subset of topics I had studied most. It probably also helped that GYN was paradoxically one of my best subjects on Step 2 (way back in August), and so I had focused on OB (my worst subject on Step 2) for this exam.

You may wonder why there was such a disparity in my performance on Step 2, and the answer is simple. It’s not that I’m some kind of GYN savant. It’s just that Step 2 Secrets is organized alphabetically by subject, and I only got to the letter L in time to take the test. So anything I knew beyond Laboratory Medicine was from my long-term memory.

I think at least part of the reason I finished quickly is that I haven’t felt this un-distracted-by-pain since my medicine shelf. Most of my life is spent between 2 and 4 on the pain scale, with occasional excursions to 7, 8 or 9, and it’s only every few years or so that I’m pain-free for any significant length of time. I don’t take any narcotics for pain, and I never have. –I’m not opposed to narcotics when used appropriately, but their appropriate use is for visceral pain and acute somatic pain. My pain is chronic and somatic, and is best treated by suppressing the underlying inflammation, not by dulling the central sensation of pain.

The pain slows me down. However, I’m lucky to have some excess brain capacity, so the net effect is to level the playing field. That sounds arrogant, but really it’s just a fact and nothing to be particularly proud of. Some people inherit money, I inherited intelligence. It’s what I do with it that reflects on me as a person, not the simple fact that I have it.

But I do wonder what I’d have accomplished by now if I’d been unencumbered by pain this whole time.

Kangaroo court

March 1, 2007 at 6:18 am | Posted in personal favorites, professional ethics | Leave a comment

I’ve been struggling with an ethical issue on my current rotation. There’s a resident who’s on probation with the program, and while he’s not the best resident I’ve encountered, as far as I can tell he’s not incompetent, either. He’s made mistakes, certainly, but the one I’ve personally witnessed could probably have been prevented by appropriate supervision.

The background issue is that he’s apparently said inappropriate things to a number of students, who have apparently complained about it. I myself have not been the target of any of it, and as far as I can tell, his issues with students mainly revolve around their use of medical slang in formal presentations (i.e. labs are “cooking” etc). But I’ve encountered a number of attendings over the years who share his aversion to such language. They consider it sloppy and indicating a lack of attention to detail.

But the issue for me is that, during my mid-block evaluation, the clerkship director said outright that he was on probation, and that she was trying to fire him, and that she would welcome any complaints from us that would help her to do so. And according to every other students I spoke to, she had said pretty much the same thing to all of us.

I was appalled. Having been in a position to discipline and fire employees, myself, I’m shocked that she would say anything of the kind, much less to a student. Leaving aside how unprofessional it is to discuss disciplinary actions with a resident’s subordinate, her whole approach to the remediation process is clearly punitive rather than educational, or even objective. The whole point of progressive discipline is to remediate and salvage, and not to make the decision to terminate until there is simply no other option. By stating that she wants to fire him, and asking for evidence to justify her decision, she effectively has denied this resident due process. And that’s a wrongful termination lawsuit waiting to happen.

In my experience, a person who is placed in a remediation process will do one of two things, either they will decide they don’t want to make the effort, and will start looking for a job elsewhere, or they will struggle to turn it around so they can stay. And if you support someone in that effort, you will end up with an incredibly loyal and hard-working employee. If instead you hound them to the point where they’re unable to function because of the stress, all you really prove is that you shouldn’t be in charge of people.

It’s a rookie mistake. But if you’re going to make a mistake like that, for God’s sake don’t go around advertising the fact that your department’s due process is a sham.

At the very least, I’ve declined to participate in the sham. I got sent an electronic evaluation for the resident in question, and I declined it. I wanted to give a decent evaluation, but I was afraid to become a target, myself.

So my dilemma is over whether or not to tell her superiors about it. Out of loyalty to my school, I definitely should–they need to know that her actions have exposed the school to liability. But she has pretty wide latitude over whether I pass or fail this rotation, and I don’t have time to retake it. So I’m not sure what to do.

However, hyphenation is still on the table

March 1, 2007 at 4:41 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

So, my manuscript was accepted for publication. Hooray! At least that’s one good thing to happen this year.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.