Hazing

October 23, 2007 at 11:01 pm | Posted in professional ethics | Leave a comment

Wow, I feel bad for our current sub-I. Really great guy, but my senior is pushing him to see how long he can stay awake. He hasn’t said that’s what he’s doing, but when I made a joke to that effect today, he gave me this “shut up now before you give away my plan” look.

As for me, I’d rather do a simple case that I can participate in from start to finish, than watch other people operate for 18 hours in the hope that they’ll let me sew a few centimeters of skin at the end. Especially when there’s a fifty-fifty chance I won’t get to anyway.

That’s the thing I most disagree with about medical training. Most people have no problem staying awake when they’re actively working. But making people stay awake and act interested when they’re not actively involved is just torture. Why do we do it?

Maybe it’s because I’m older, or because of the amount of crap I’ve been through in my life, or maybe it’s just that my self-worth is not tied to what other people think of me. Whatever the reason, I have no problem putting aside my own needs when patient care requires it, but I don’t believe in suffering when that isn’t the case, just to prove I can take it. There’s something very warped about judging people based on how much abuse they’ll suffer just to suck up to you.

In any event, they’re definitely hazing this sub-I pretty hard, and so far he hasn’t missed a step. Good for him.

867-5309

October 20, 2007 at 12:50 pm | Posted in internship | 4 Comments

Someone at UW Medicine has a sense of humor. Or maybe at CMS . . .

. . . nah. It’s gotta be the UW people.

Also I changed my page settings so that the blog will load faster. It was starting to irritate me, so I can only imagine how much it irritated my three readers.

So I’m on the second month of plastics now. And while there’s absolutely no danger of my deciding on plastics as a career, it has been nice to be able to follow the results of my suturing work over time. I’ve been keeping a very careful record of exactly which layers and areas of skin I close. Not only because I want to be able to remember it when I see them in clinic, but because there’s a tendency in surgery to blame the most junior person for anything that turns out crappy-looking. And I only want to be blamed for my own crappy work.

In fact, the other day in clinic, one of our recent bilateral reconstruction patients came in complaining about her scars, and the fact that obviously the attending had done one side, and the trainees the other. Sure enough, one side had a nice, thin, straight closure, and the other was lumpy and bumpy and very aesthetically unpleasing. There were two other incisions from the same surgery that also looked thin, straight and flat. She demanded to know which part I had done. So I consulted my little surgical record book, and pointed to one of the thin and straight closures. Then she demanded to know who had done the lumpy-bumpy one and I told her (truthfully) that I only kept a record of my own work and couldn’t say for sure who had done what elsewhere.

On the interview trail last year, an interviewer told me that one of my recommenders said I had “good hands.” He then asked me on what basis the recommender had made such a comment. I said that I had no idea how any of my letter writers would know that about me, and that my goal was simply to be as good as I could become with whatever natural skill I possess.

Which is true–I didn’t want to say it in exactly these words, but I was expecting to struggle just to be average. So I’m glad not to make a liar out of my recommender.

Is the plastics intern really necessary?

October 16, 2007 at 1:13 am | Posted in internship | Leave a comment

So. There are two PGY2 neurosurgery openings for 2008. One of them is an expansion, and the other appears to be an early dropout (someone matched there for 2008, and the program isn’t adding a new position).

And the earliest I can get in to see my program director to discuss my plans for next year is the end of October. It’s very frustrating, because I don’t want to apply without her support.

Neither of these programs is a place I applied to last year. And since I scoured every source of information I could find about every program in the U.S. before deciding where to apply, that actually means something. In both cases, it wasn’t so much that I’d heard anything negative, just that they were missing something I really wanted in a program, and I wasn’t aware of any compensatory strength in some other area of importance to me.

Of course, it could very well have one, and there’s just not enough information out there for me to have heard about it.

Really I’d prefer to stay here, but I don’t see any of these guys leaving, either voluntarily or involuntarily. And I’m not reapplying through the match because a) I can’t afford it, b) my vacation month isn’t until the spring and c) I can’t afford it. Also I have my Harborview neurosurgery month during the most active 4 weeks of interview season. And of course, right now I’m lolling around on plastics for two solid months, which is a nice break but of limited usefulness to me in finding a spot for next year.

All in all, very frustrating.

Also I feel like I’m not getting much out of this rotation. The division just hired a PA, and so most teaching efforts are being directed toward teaching her, and there aren’t enough cases for both of us to be scrubbed in and helping. Or actually, there are plenty of cases, just not enough OR time for the division to be running them simultaneously so we can both be involved. So she gets priority, because she’ll be a permanent part of the service, and theoretically will be teaching subsequent interns. There’s often not even room for us all to be scrubbed. This is billed as one of the “operative” rotations for interns, but frankly I operated more when I was on trauma.

And there’s clinic three days a week, so whenever there are cases and clinic going on at the same time, my job is to be in clinic. But even in clinic, it seems like I’m there mostly to help carry the dictation load. In every other respect, the service is micromanaged by the senior. Which may simply be his style. However, I don’t like having to redo my work over matters of personal preference. So now I just wait for him to tell me exactly what he wants, because if I try to anticipate what he wants, whatever I did, he’ll want something different. That’s the problem with micromanagement: it discourages initiative.

So my scutwork is being micromanaged, and my reward for doing the scut well and efficiently on this service is being done to a large extent by a PA, who currently can’t function in any non-operative capacity without asking a ton of questions of whoever happens to be nearby (usually me). And who arrives after me every day and goes home before me. I’ve been nice about it so far, but the bottom line is that the service doesn’t need an intern, and it doesn’t seem like the intern is going to get much out of it either.

On the gap between perception and reality

October 12, 2007 at 11:20 pm | Posted in internship | Leave a comment

Last weekend I was on call for general surgery at the U, and I ran into one of the medicine consultants for a patient I was covering. After discussing the patient on whom he was consulting (and whose issue, coincidentally, was one of the medicine cases I got for my CCS–of all the luck!), the conversation turned chatty, and he asked me where I had gone to school. I told him. He asked me why I had chosen surgery, and made some remark along the lines of it being difficult to know whether you like medicine when you haven’t had a high quality clerkship experience.

(*sigh* people are such suckers for propaganda)

I replied that I had actually quite an excellent medicine clerkship, and that while I have immense respect for people who choose to go into internal medicine, it was not for me. I told him that I like surgery because I like fixing the problem. When I’m operating, I forget how long I’ve been standing, and whether my feet hurt or not. There was never really even a question of whether I would go into medicine or not, although I did my best to keep an open mind until my neurosurgery clerkship. After that it was pretty much over.

Another one bites the dust

October 9, 2007 at 9:40 pm | Posted in medical licensing exams, professional ethics | Leave a comment

Goodbye Step 3. And with that, my licensure testing for medicine is (hopefully) done.

I say hopefully because I haven’t gotten my scores back. But I’ll be pretty surprised if I fail. None of my CCS patients died, although a couple of them could have. I got a boatload of surgical issues, so I got to play trauma doc at least 3 or 4 times. Thank God for my two months on trauma at Harborview. Although I had to keep remembering that I am not the surgery service on this test; I’m a medicine doctor who has to consult general surgery.

The patients were so remarkably like Harborview patients, that in one case I was actually counting down the hours until he went into heroin withdrawal. By that point I had begun to recognize the series of events that precedes early closure of the case, and when it started happening to this guy before he withdrew, I was like, “No! you can’t close on me before I treat his withdrawal, dammit!”

Really I have no idea how I did on that section. There were things I know I forgot to do, but it was usually because I knew exactly where to go with the case, and in most cases it was low-yield. It’s one of the things you’re “supposed” to do, though, so I hope it doesn’t count against me. There was only one case where I really floundered, and delayed appropriate treatment by a few days. But it was non-emergent, and I did eventually do the right thing. And after reading about cases other people got, I may have royally screwed up another, but I can’t remember enough details about it to know for sure. I’d like to think I would NOT make that particular mistake, but it was early in the case series and I wasn’t quite acclimated to the test format. So who knows?

Anyway, we’ll see in a few weeks whether I passed or not.

Congested but well-rested

October 8, 2007 at 10:38 pm | Posted in medical licensing exams, professional ethics | Leave a comment

I’m between halves of step 3 right now. Day 1 is over, and day 2 looms tomorrow. Don’t have much to say about it, except that this is the first step exam for which I’ve actually gotten a good night’s sleep beforehand.

I also have an upper respiratory illness of some sort. It’s going around the surgery department, and I must have caught it late last week. The residents’ room is probably one big fomite right now, and I was on call Sunday.

The test starts at 8 each morning, so I went in early today and finished up discharge paperwork for the patient that left yesterday (I was on call, but not for my own service, and the other services kept me busy with their stuff the whole day.) I printed out lists and left at 7 for the test center. Now that’s dedication.

Medicine, I cut you.

October 6, 2007 at 8:14 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

So. I have Step 3 on Monday and Tuesday. I’ve been trying to study, with marginal success. I signed up for USMLEworld, and have done a couple of practice tests. But it’s always the same: I miss easy stuff, and nail all the stuff everyone else misses. Seriously, what happened to my brain in medical school? Did I not memorize all the same material as everyone else?

Apparently my neurons have rejected the banal details of bread and butter medicine. Stuck-up little buggers. They’re just not interested in DM, COPD, MI, the basic stuff common in all our fields. “Come on, Jill, we learned this stuff in pharmacy school, we’re so tired of it” they say. But ask them something obscure and crazy, and they’re all over it.

I’ve said previously that I’m just lucky at diagnosing unusual things, but that’s not really true. The truth is, I just don’t want to be labeled as someone who ought to be in medicine rather than surgery. So I hide behind a facade of “lucky guessing.” And, to make things worse, my reasoning is usually intuitive rather than deductive, which means I often can’t give “sufficient” reason for why I think something is correct. And that only irritates people further when I do turn out to be right.

Which is another reason I like surgery, because by and large, diagnoses are evident. If there’s any disagreement based on one person’s logic vs another’s, in most cases the scan will quickly expose any sophistry, no matter how compellingly argued or authoritatively spoken. There are exceptions, but between radiology, pathology and the medical examiner, surgeons get a ruthless accounting that keeps all of us humble, even if we don’t seem so to others.

Do I miss being called upon to figure out crazy diagnoses? Yes. Do I miss it more than I would the OR? No. Not even close.

If you can’t be nice, at least be Machiavellian

October 6, 2007 at 12:02 am | Posted in internship, professional ethics | Leave a comment

Late August on Trauma 1 at Harborview was quite an experience. We had 40 patients on the floor, another 15 or so in ICU and a bunch of consults on top of that. And we were having all kinds of difficulty getting our patients out the door.

The nurses also didn’t like the official “floor intern” during that period, who was very insistent on the whole “respect my authority” business. Which is a big turnoff among nurses who routinely hold our hands and keep us from killing people every July and August. Although the arrogance wasn’t entirely unwarranted. This particular resident (who was actually PGY2) was very efficient, and taught us all a thing or two about how to get things done. So you may ask why it would be important to get along with the nurses. Here’s why: that resident had all kinds of trouble discharging patients. Whereas I was the OR/clinic/consult intern during that period, and the minute our roles reversed, there was a massive service diuresis.

Perhaps it was coincidence. Or perhaps all the hard work had been done and I was merely reaping the rewards. However, the diuresis continued for the full week I was the main floor intern, and the entire following week as well when I was the secondary floor intern. We did also have a change of chiefs in that period, and although that was a factor, it began before the changeover.

As an intern, you have three masters: the patients and their families, your supervising residents, and the nursing/allied health staff.

The patients are probably the easiest to handle. They just want to be heard, and to feel confident that you know what you’re doing. Sometimes it’s tricky when you have to acknowledge their opinion about another person on the team without agreeing. And you can easily get stuck trying to explain things you neither understand completely nor totally agree with if you do understand. And that’s hard. But anyone who survived med school should know how to do that.

Your supervising residents are the hardest to deal with. What they say they want, and what they really want are not at all the same. And then you get into situations where you know that your senior will tell you one thing, and your chief will say the opposite. The system works fine when you think the senior is right, because then you just ask the senior. The heirarchy has been followed and you’ve done the right thing for your patient. And if it does turn out to be wrong, your senior takes the heat.

But what if the senior disagrees with your plan, but you know your chief would let you do it? It’s a no-win situation for the intern: ask the senior and you get overruled, or ask the chief and piss off the senior with your end-run. So you have to think hard about whether it’s a battle worth fighting on behalf of the patient or not, because your senior can sandbag you pretty much with impunity.

If you follow the heirarchy, and the senior’s plan has immediate adverse consequences, again it will be between the chief and senior. But what’s more common is to be in a situation where the consequences are not immediate, and the issue is one I’m aware of because of my pharmacy background, which affects surgical outcome via the patient’s overall health status. Which is exactly the area where the chief’s thinking is more sophisticated than the senior’s.

So it’s pretty much the same issue I’ve had all along in medical school. I have this body of knowledge, and a level of sophistication about using it that is well beyond intern level. But then there’s this whole other area of surgical knowledge and skills in which I am clearly still a novice. And while I’m so focused on learning these basics, I can’t always be counted on to remember all the nuances of my other field. But when I do sporadically remember, it’s frustrating to be shot down by someone who doesn’t actually know better than me.

The nursing and allied health staff are actually pretty easy to deal with. It’s easier because I used to be one. It means so much for the doctor just to recognize that the job entails more than simply following their orders. Although, by the same token, please don’t whine to me about all the crap you have to get done. I guarantee you my list is longer than yours, even if I don’t look frazzled about it. So in general I dealt with the nurses as people first, and people who take orders from me second. It was both our jobs to do what was best for the patient, and if our opinions differed we would discuss it, and it would usually result in a better plan than either of us had come up with on our own. Some of the nurses I liked more than others, and by the end of the rotation I was universally cranky no matter how much I liked them. But on the whole, we got along well.

Why doctors make bad patients

October 2, 2007 at 6:52 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Well that was three hours of my life I’ll never get back.

Un-freakin-believable. I went to the ER today because my ankle’s been hurting me since Friday, and I’m 99% certain I have a stress fracture. Which is rarely visible on x-ray, and for which there’s nothing to be done but rest the involved ankle, and that’s simply not going to happen. So why bother?

Why? Because I also have point tenderness over the medial malleolus, which according the Ottawa Ankle Rules deserves an x-ray–not to rule out a stress fracture, but to rule out anything else.

Let me repeat that one more time: STRESS FRACTURE CANNOT BE RULED OUT BY AN X-RAY 5 DAYS FROM THE ONSET OF PAIN.

Here’s a direct quote from that article:

Imaging Studies:


But the NP went ahead and ruled it out anyway, because there was no fracture visible on x-ray. What gets me is that she did this AFTER consulting via telephone with the orthopedic resident, who really should have known better. I know it’s the easy call to ascribe it to the osteoarthritis in that joint, which IS clearly visible on x-ray, but that’s been there for a while, and this pain is different.

So what pisses me off is that I was not looking to get out of anything because of a stress fracture. Eventually it heals one way or another, and no way am I walking around with a CAM boot if I can walk at all without one, and function adequately despite the injury. I just wanted to know that it wasn’t something worse. But now there’s a document on my chart stating that even a stress fracture has been ruled out, and because it’s written in the chart it has to be true–even if it’s impossible.

Is it too much to ask that anyone purporting to diagnose (or rule out) disease should actually READ about the disease before doing so?

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.